Women's Euro 2017: 'Brave' decision helped England - watch & vote
Last updated on .From the section Women's Football
A "brave" refereeing decision helped England beat Spain at Women's Euro 2017, with the official changing her mind about a penalty after Lucy Bronze apparently recited the rules to her.
With England leading 1-0 in their Group D match, Spain were initially awarded a spot-kick when the ball struck striker Ellen White's arm in the area.
But the decision was quickly reversed.
England had protested that the handball was not intentional, as it deflected up off White's thigh, after she slipped.
The Lionesses went on to win 2-0 to move three points clear at the top of the group and will qualify for the quarter-finals if they avoid defeat against Portugal on Thursday.
So, what happened, what do the rules say and do you think it should have been a penalty? You can watch the incident, review the rules and vote below.
- Report: England Women 2-0 Spain Women
- Newsbeat: 'Special celebrations and Love Island'
- Football Daily podcast: Lionesses make it two wins from two
- 'Euro 2017: The relaxed, friendly tournament'
The Bronze effect
England defender Bronze's intervention proved key to changing referee Carina Vitulano's mind.
"Before the tournament, Uefa send referees in to have meetings with you and they said if it hits you or is a deflection it's not really a handball - you can't really help it," said Bronze.
"I saw it right in front of me and I was like 'that is not a penalty' - it's hit her leg and then gone up and hit her arm. It's a deflection and [the referee] said 'you're right, it's my mistake'.
"Fair play to her for doing that. I don't think a lot of referees would be brave enough to do that in such a big game and such a big decision.
"I think the Spanish girls were a bit disappointed and annoyed but, if they watch it back, they will see it is a completely accidental handball."
Bronze added: "There are a lot of grey areas. I really paid attention [in those meetings]. I had my book out and everything, making sure if I was playing I knew exactly what was a yellow card and red card.
"There are some different kind of refereeing laws in this tournament so, as a defender, you really need to be switched on."
What do the laws say?
According to the Fifa's 2016-17 laws of the game, handling the ball is the "deliberate act of a player making contact with the ball with the hand or arm".
It says the following must be considered:
- The movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand);
- The distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball);
- The position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an infringement;
- Touching the ball with an object held in the hand (clothing, shinguard etc) is an infringement;
- Hitting the ball with a thrown object (boot, shinguard etc) is an infringement.
Vote - penalty or no penalty?
So, was Italian referee Carina Vitulano correct in not awarding Spain a penalty?
In a BBC Sport poll, 72% of voters thought it was the correct decision.
What they said about the decision
After the game, England boss Mark Sampson told BBC Sport: "Whatever the rules are, the referee decides how the rules are interpreted so we'll respect that and play within them.
"I haven't seen it back yet, but obviously to correct a mistake you have to respect the bravery to do that, so congratulations, it was the right decision in the end."
Former England goalkeeper and pundit Rachel Brown-Finnis told BBC Radio 5 live: "It is mystifying.
"I would love to hear the explanation of how they came to firstly give the penalty and then change their minds.
"I think that is beyond most our comprehension of the rules."
'A famous night for England'
Sampson - who had named an unchanged side for the first time in his four years as England boss - rated the victory alongside some of the nation's finest footballing moments.
"I'm in awe of this group in terms of their resilience, their work ethic and their sheer desire to do their family, friends and country proud," he said.
"This will be a night [you mention] when you talk about English football and you think back to all those famous nights, in Euro 96, World Cup 2015 and 1966.
"It was a really memorable England performance. It's a big three points on the board.
"As much as Spain gave us problems in their build-up phase and the progression up the pitch, Karen Bardsley did not have many saves to make.
"We saw a different side to the England team tonight - the personality of the players and the team and sheer desire to move forward."
The result also kept alive Scotland's hopes of reaching the last eight of the competition, despite their 2-1 loss to Portugal earlier on Sunday.
To avoid elimination on Thursday, Anna Signeul's side must beat Spain while hoping that England defeat Portugal, and must finish with a better goal difference than both Spain and Portugal when only the matches between the three sides are taken into account.
Comments
Join the conversation
"Arm was in an unnatural position, penalty."
=====
You have your legs slide out from underneath you & see how 'natural' your arms are!
Whilst falling, the ball ricocheted of her leg into her arm. Correct call by the ref.
Restart was a tricky call too. A dropped ball on the edge of the area would be unfair to Eng, but the free kick unfair to Spa. Credit to ref, she had ‘balls’.
Could comments on the referee's decision be restricted to people who have refereed, say, 50 games
===
This is tongue in cheek, right?
Otherwise, a stupid comment.
Well done ladies, along with our Cricket team you have made us proud
Regardless of right or wrong (hand ball is a hand ball imo) once a decision has been made the decision should stand shows the refs are weak and admitting they've made a mistake.
Ridiculous statement, it's not weak to show you've made a mistake, it's brave. How many referees have thought 'I cocked that up, I need to make amends'. many a game ruined by this thinking.
Secondly, the referee's decision was called 'brave' which, in the strange world of football refereeing, it was. But it really was just a sensible decision and it is just a shame we don't see more of this in the men's game.
Good on CH 4 for showing it
Ok the standard isn't PL level, but if you love football, you enjoy watching a game down the local park or your local pub team play, then womens footie is just fine
Go girls, lets see you win the tourno
The reason is because she was persuaded she was wrong by one of the England players - and the referee then agreed she had made a mistake.
It just goes to show you can argue with the ref, and the ref will change their mind!
I've thought the standard of officiating has been a bit ordinary, but I never expected the ref to change her mind after giving the decision
Big respect to her for having the 'balls' to admit she'd made an error
Well done Lionessessss
Keep your focus
.
Well done Scotland, still in the fight
Go Scots
So the question is, did the england player deliberately kick the ball into her own hand, if yes it's a penalty, if no it's not. I'd suggest that there was no benefit for her slipping, miskicking the ball into her own hand and thus the decision was correct.
All the men commenting on here make me laugh. When was the last time the men's team did so well
===
This must be the most stupid comment of the day.
What has the performance of the men's team got to do with men voicing an opinion?
How do you know which are men and which aren't, you can't go by the name. For example, what are you? What am I?
It was the correct decision in the end.
The referee simply did her job and credit to her for doing the right thing for the game.
There is nothing brave about it at all as that would imply a fear of making decisions, which clearly was not the case here.
BBC journalists pls stop behaving like hacks with sensationalism in mind.