Djab Wurrung tree: Anger over sacred Aboriginal tree bulldozed for highway

  • Published
The directions tree before it was cut down, with an Aboriginal flag on itImage source, SEAN PARIS
Image caption,
Aboriginal people have fought to protect culturally significant trees

The bulldozing of a sacred tree for Aboriginal people to clear land for a highway has sparked anger in Australia.

Protesters have long camped at the site in Victoria to defend culturally significant trees, including some where local Djab Wurrung women have traditionally gone to give birth.

But state authorities cut down the Djab Wurrung "directions tree" on Monday, the activists said.

Officials defended the felling, saying the tree was not on a protection list.

In a deal last year, Aboriginal landowners negotiated with the Victorian government to save around a dozen of 250 "culturally significant" trees from destruction.

However, activists independent of the Aboriginal land group have remained at the site near Buangor to try to save more trees.

Victoria Police said they had arrested 25 protesters on Tuesday who refused to leave the site as land clearing work continued.

Footage posted by activists on social media showed officers forcibly dragging people away, and some protesters who had climbed into the trees.

Authorities said the tree removed on Monday was a fiddleback thought to be about 100 years old, but protesters said it was in fact a yellow box species. They estimated it was 350 years old.

Many condemned the news of its destruction.

"Absolutely gutted and feel the pain of our ancestors right now," tweeted Lidia Thorpe, the first federal Aboriginal senator for the state of Victoria, and a Djab Wurrung woman.

This Twitter post cannot be displayed in your browser. Please enable Javascript or try a different browser.View original content on Twitter
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Skip twitter post by Lidia Thorpe

Allow Twitter content?

This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Twitter’s cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.
End of twitter post by Lidia Thorpe

Aboriginal writer Celeste Liddle blamed the state government for "cutting down a sacred part of Djab Wurrung heritage".

Many Aboriginal people say the land is paramount to their identity. Djab Wurring activists have previously compared the cultural importance of trees in the area to a church or other spiritual place.

Among trees that will be protected are two "birthing" trees. These are centuries-old trees where women have also buried their placentas after giving birth, as part of a cultural tradition.

Critics were also angry at the timing of the destruction, noting it had coincided with the high-profile announcement of an end to lockdown in the state capital, Melbourne.

Image source, DJAP WURRUNG HERITAGE PROTECTION EMBASSY
Image caption,
The tree's removal is part of a highway upgrade

Victoria's government has staunchly defended the highway project - a 12km (7.4-mile) expansion of a road between Melbourne and Adelaide - arguing it will reduce traffic accidents.

"With more than 100 crashes on the Western Highway in recent years, including 11 deaths, we're getting on with this urgent safety upgrade that will save lives," it said in a statement.

It said it hadn't touched a separate tree identified as "directions tree" - which is protected - and suggested the activists' classification had differed from the land group's.

State officials said the project had received approval from traditional owner groups and passed federal environmental and legal checks.

"We've listened to Aboriginal voices every step of the way," said a spokesman.

Earlier this year, the destruction of ancient Aboriginal caves in Western Australia by a mining company also prompted a public outcry, and criticism of Australia's cultural heritage laws.